The opposite of shame is vulnerability, which requires safety.
Inspired by Brene Brown’s new book Dare to Lead, the picture of a “shame and blame” organizational culture crystallized that which holds most organizations captive from the effectiveness the world needs them to have. The financial cost of a shame and blame culture results in lost sales from lack of engagement, lost morale, wasted time, turnover and grievances. The human cost is far worse.
What does shame and blame look like? It’s based on the understanding that “guilt” means I made a mistake or did something wrong (or even bad), and “shame” means I am bad and, therefore, not worthy of connection. In an organizational culture where emotional safety is not present, we are forced to look out to protect ourselves. Here are some examples of what a shame and blame culture might look like:
A shame and blame management culture comes from the desire to hold onto power, self-protect, and jockey for favor. Sometimes it simply comes from the wounded and insecure places leaders lead from. It leads to a tragic lack of safety that, in turn, leads to a lack of creativity and risk-taking necessary for producing results. It also leads to not having each other’s backs, destroys trust and contributes to people “armoring up,” as Brene Brown puts it.
The opposite of shame is vulnerability, and vulnerability requires safety. It requires a leader to exemplify the safety that leads to vulnerability, and then call out shame and blame when it shows up. And when I say it takes a leader, I don’t mean it takes THE one top leader of the organization. It takes leaders and influencers throughout to be vigilant about creating and preserving a culture of safety that leads to vulnerability.
Vulnerability produces the kinds of relationships and discussions that bind teams together to creatively talk about solutions to the biggest problems we face. Vulnerability is the predisposition that makes leaders either teachable and self-examining or not; something so elusive to so many of the most gifted leaders. I can work with the strongest of leaders who are teachable and reflective, but it's almost impossible to work with leaders who think they’ve “got it”, and who don’t seek out the truth about how they come across to the people they work with.
1 in 3 women and 1 in 8 men in Canada are survivors of abuse. How will the church care for them?
Have you ever seen a christian Leader avoid conflict in the name of peacemaking, and then when conflict dose happen it's not done well?
The only way to have the influence you want as a leader is to create psychological safety.